5.2 KiB
issueRef, version, updatedBy, updatedAt
| issueRef | version | updatedBy | updatedAt | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #154 | 3 |
|
1786007117802 |
Objective
Build a first-class attachment pipeline for agent-facing chat flows so files provided by the user are persisted, referenced, and made readable by agents without relying on prompt-text hacks.
Why this exists
Current custom agent chat can only append a picked local path into the prompt text. That is not a robust attachment model and it does not guarantee that the target agent sandbox can read the file. Clipboard-paste support should not be built on top of this weak contract.
Product target
Match as closely as reasonable the ergonomics of Codex / Claude Code style attachments while staying aligned with IdeA architecture:
- attachments are first-class entities, not just a string in the prompt;
- files are persisted in a stable host-controlled location;
- agents receive attachment context through an explicit contract;
- sandbox readability is guaranteed by construction for attached files;
- the model can support images first, then general files, without redesign.
Non-goals
- No one-off frontend-only workaround that stores a browser blob URL or injects base64 into the prompt.
- No attachment flow that depends on the source file remaining at an arbitrary user path outside IdeA-managed storage.
- No design that works only for one provider/profile while breaking the abstraction for others.
Expected architecture
A solid outcome should include the following, subject to Architect arbitration:
- A durable attachment store owned by IdeA for agent/chat inputs.
- A stable attachment identity and metadata contract (id, filename, mime, size, source kind, storage path, createdAt).
- A transport contract from frontend to backend that sends structured attachment intent rather than only prompt text.
- A backend/application path that materializes attachments into the attachment store and exposes them to the launched agent session.
- A sandbox policy/story that makes attached files readable by the target agent without broadening access to arbitrary user filesystem paths.
Storage / sandbox direction
Preferred direction:
- store agent-chat attachments under a project-owned IdeA path, for example
.ideai/attachments/agent-chat/...or equivalent durable app-owned location that is intentionally mounted/readable for agent runs; - if temporary staging is needed, staging must still end in a durable managed location before send;
- the chosen location must be easy to add to sandbox readable roots with minimal blast radius.
Important constraint:
- attached files should be readable even when the original source came from clipboard paste or from a user path outside the project root.
UX contract this foundation should unlock
- picker-selected files become first-class attachments;
- clipboard-pasted images can use the exact same downstream attachment pipeline;
- future drag-and-drop can reuse the same contract;
- chat UI can display attachment chips/previews based on metadata instead of raw path strings.
Suggested work split
Architecture
- define ownership and location of the attachment store;
- decide whether the store is project-local vs app-data with projection into sandbox roots;
- define DTO/port contract for structured chat attachments;
- define lifecycle rules (persist until manually removed? per conversation? per turn?).
Backend / app-tauri / application
- add write path for attachment creation/import;
- add any read-model or DTO needed by the custom chat flow;
- ensure structured launch / send path can pass attachment references to the session layer;
- ensure sandbox roots include the managed attachment location with least privilege.
Frontend
- stop treating chat attachments as prompt suffix text;
- represent selected attachments as typed UI state;
- render chips/previews from metadata;
- call the new attachment APIs.
QA
- verify picked file outside project root becomes readable by the agent through managed import;
- verify attachment survives send and session restart expectations defined by architecture;
- verify sandbox does not gain broad arbitrary read access.
Acceptance criteria
- There is a first-class attachment contract for custom/structured agent chat.
- A user-selected file is imported into IdeA-managed storage before send.
- The target agent can read the attachment from within its sandbox without extra manual permission tweaking.
- The prompt path no longer relies on a brittle plain-text
[Fichier joint: ...]suffix as the only attachment mechanism. - The contract is reusable by clipboard image paste and future drag/drop.
Risks to watch
- sandbox over-broadening to all of
$HOMEor arbitrary original source paths; - provider-specific coupling that leaks one CLI's attachment semantics into the generic product contract;
- retention bloat if attachments are never garbage-collected;
- hidden duplication / large binary churn if images are copied repeatedly without lifecycle policy.
Deliverable quality bar
This ticket is explicitly meant to prevent bricolage. If a proposed implementation cannot explain how attachment persistence, identity, routing, and sandbox readability work end-to-end, it is not sufficient.